Spare Parts
For non-modeling topics and those without a home elsewhere.
Frame style
flitzer
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Member Since: November 13, 2003
entire network: 2,240 Posts
KitMaker Network: 677 Posts
Posted: Monday, August 01, 2005 - 07:52 PM UTC
Hi
Now I've managed to upload...lol....
I've tried to clean up the base frame for the profiles and wondered which you prefer?

1. Previous style



Or 2. the latest style


Sometimes you can't see the wood from the trees...
Just wondered thats all.....thanks

Cheers
Peter

Tarok
Visit this Community
Victoria, Australia
Member Since: July 28, 2004
entire network: 10,889 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,373 Posts
Posted: Monday, August 01, 2005 - 08:03 PM UTC
IMHO I prefer the 2nd one. Dunno why... just appeals more to me...

ps. glad to see you overcame your upload problem
Grumpyoldman
Staff MemberConsigliere
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Member Since: October 17, 2003
entire network: 15,338 Posts
KitMaker Network: 5,072 Posts
Posted: Monday, August 01, 2005 - 11:04 PM UTC
Which is Doris????
I like the layout on #2 over #1.....
slodder
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Member Since: February 22, 2002
entire network: 11,718 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,584 Posts
Posted: Monday, August 01, 2005 - 11:40 PM UTC
I like #2, the thinner frame doesn't distract my focus. The heavier title bar 'defines' it better and separates it from the subject mater better. Plus the color of the title bar and frame blend and create cohesiveness

flitzer
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Member Since: November 13, 2003
entire network: 2,240 Posts
KitMaker Network: 677 Posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 - 02:44 AM UTC
Thanks for the comments lads.

I first changed to potrait when I did only top and side views. But as I tend to include a front view these days the landscape format seems to serve as a better option.

And I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks the option 2 is better....well that's what I hoped.

Thanks again
Peter
:-)