Quoted Text
makes you wonder why photographic evidence is still a legible evidence in courts
Being a crime scene photographer in Montreal and now using digital photography
I can tell you that in court it has been accepted to present photographic evidence take with a digital camera.
Remember that when a digital camera records an image, it sets up the meta file
which records all aspects of info pertaining to that actual image; date, time f-stop
etc.......so when a file is open and manipulated, it is all recorded.
As far as an art form is concerned, well having worked with PHOTOSHOP in
other aspects of photography, My opinion is that the program is nothing
more than an image enhancing tool.
The real art form is the photography. Let us not put aside what photographers
were all taught years ago, Composition, lighting and manual image manipulation.
The PHOTOSHOP tool can correct a bad photograph, help enhance it with all
kinds of effects of which most were done in the darkroom anyways years ago.
The difference is for example it would take me 2 hours work to posterize an
image 10 years ago now it takes me 30 seconds.
So as most people living in this fast world, PHOTOSHOP is a great image
enhancing/manipulation tools but I would not call it and art form.
My opinion,
Cheers,
Joe