I realise that at most there would have been 90? Tigers avaliable, and considering the forces arrayed against them, this may seem like a small pebble in a large pond. But consider this, througout the war the Panzerwaffe maintained a 5-1 kill ratio.
So what if any difference would their deployment have made?
Could they have operated as the ciutting edge of the attack to over come the massive Soviet tnak forces, thus allowing the accompanying Panzer and Infantry Divisions an easier time?
Or would the unproveness of the Tiger have been more a hinderance than an asset?
My curiosity about this started after reading George M< Nipe's "Decision in the Ukraine". The facts and figures he provides for the Tigers at Kursk made me wonder about their deployment at Stalingrad. Hopefully all this rambling will make sense
Regards from the Swamp
Hawkeye



















