My only complaint (and I'm am not really complaining
) is the use of AKatsiya who is very easy on the eye but is she really appropriate? Remembering that the hobby is not just the domain of the over 30 male crowd anymore. Younger modellers would most likely purchase this magazine as it is on par with the price for normal type publication as well as the growing female base.What I'm trying to say is that in this day and age when our children are being bombarded with equality between the sexes and all the other PC nonsense, would the inclusion of an attractive yet slightly under-dressed woman be seen as typifying females as sex objects? Please don't get me wrong. AKatsiya is a nice distraction and for me, she does add a little more interest. I'm not an old stick in the mud, I yearn for the days of my youth when as a young boy I could go to the Doctors or the barber and be able to read People with Pics and Post just so I could look at the ladies dressed in bikinis. But nowadays when men can't even put up a tool calender at work because it has a scantily dressed female displaying the tools, do we need the likes of AKatsiya in our hobby magazines.
Just food for thought and a chance for logical debate amongst like minded peers.
Cheers,
John





















