i had the great surprise this morning of writing the word "ar-se-nal" on a forum answer (without the '-') and getting this: [auto-censored]nal which produced a relative misunderstanding of what I was saying.
*could it be* a small defect of the system?
User Support
Having a problem with the site? Post it here.
Having a problem with the site? Post it here.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Jim Starkweather
ar-se-nal
jba
Rhone, France
Member Since: November 04, 2005
entire network: 1,845 Posts
KitMaker Network: 107 Posts
Member Since: November 04, 2005
entire network: 1,845 Posts
KitMaker Network: 107 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 01:22 AM UTC
matt
Campaigns Administrator
New York, United States
Member Since: February 28, 2002
entire network: 5,957 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,626 Posts
Member Since: February 28, 2002
entire network: 5,957 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,626 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 01:35 AM UTC
been that way for Quite awhile..... We all know that an ar-se is....... which is whay IIRC it's doing that
jba
Rhone, France
Member Since: November 04, 2005
entire network: 1,845 Posts
KitMaker Network: 107 Posts
Member Since: November 04, 2005
entire network: 1,845 Posts
KitMaker Network: 107 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 01:47 AM UTC
Hi hear you Matt, but am I right in saying that several words of the Anglo-saxon language actually embed this succession of 4 letters, i for instance think of the word "par-se" which is useful in programmation
maybe the special anti-stupid function could check wether there is a space character before or after the use of this word?
maybe the special anti-stupid function could check wether there is a space character before or after the use of this word?
matt
Campaigns Administrator
New York, United States
Member Since: February 28, 2002
entire network: 5,957 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,626 Posts
Member Since: February 28, 2002
entire network: 5,957 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,626 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 02:15 AM UTC
Hopefully Jim will chime in on it......... I Always wondered the same thing myself.....
slodder
North Carolina, United States
Member Since: February 22, 2002
entire network: 11,718 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,584 Posts
Member Since: February 22, 2002
entire network: 11,718 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,584 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 10:02 PM UTC
Gotta agree with Jean, there are ton's of words embedded in the language(s). I think this is an example of bad code. Don't know if Jim will have the ability to modify the code, it may be 'plug in' he has little control over.
AJLaFleche
Massachusetts, United States
Member Since: May 05, 2002
entire network: 8,074 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,574 Posts
Member Since: May 05, 2002
entire network: 8,074 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,574 Posts
Posted: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 04:53 AM UTC
I assert it doesn't do this for assessment, or is this is an assumption?
matt
Campaigns Administrator
New York, United States
Member Since: February 28, 2002
entire network: 5,957 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,626 Posts
Member Since: February 28, 2002
entire network: 5,957 Posts
KitMaker Network: 2,626 Posts
Posted: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 05:42 AM UTC
ass umption???
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Posted: Thursday, September 27, 2007 - 02:36 PM UTC
arsenal
wbill76
Texas, United States
Member Since: May 02, 2006
entire network: 5,425 Posts
KitMaker Network: 341 Posts
Member Since: May 02, 2006
entire network: 5,425 Posts
KitMaker Network: 341 Posts
Posted: Friday, September 28, 2007 - 06:29 AM UTC
So now it's possible to find out who's arsenal is bigger without having to parse things out or attempt to deal with sparse resources while doing it!