I love the movie. I loved the international feel to it. Finnally a movie with Poles in it. There were some historical inaccuracies but EVERY ww2 movie has some historical inaccuracies to make it cinematic. Remember all the apologizing George C. Scott did for Patton becuase "I did the old man an injustice". Take that to mean what you will. He made a Patton TV miniseries that was as boring as driving through Manitoba at night to make up for it.
Remeber the "best way to capture a bridge is to get both ends at the same time" I think in reality the Grenider (spelling I know) Guards crossed the bridge, and the US Paratroopers crossed via river capturing the bridge in a team effort. they showed the US capturing the bridge by themselves becuase the movie had too much of a limey feel for US audiences.
German tanks were Leopards. Shermans were Shermans or Land Rovers with fiberglass shells on them.
Quoted Text
i was glad to see the Brits get their a@@es kicked, especially their paras.
In Cornerlius Ryans Book "A Bridge too Far" he interviewed a bunch of SS men who were on R&R from the Eastern Front. One of them said "I fought in Stalingrad, but I have nightmares about Arnhem". I think few would have faired better in Arnhem then the Red Devils.